Jump to content

Hastings Turtle?


Gideon

Recommended Posts

There's some great references to cretaceous turtle found at Hastings here at this link.

http://www.geo.uni-tuebingen.de/fileadmin/website/arbeitsbereich/palaeo/biogeologie/Images/Joyce_Publications/37__Joyce_et_al.__Helochelydra__reduced.pdf

Regards,

Darren.

Regards.....D&E&i

The only certainty with fossil hunting is the uncertainty.

https://lnk.bio/Darren.Withers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the 'bottom' surface is a mold of a plasteron's inner surface?

Yes...both the carapace and plastron are gone...you are seeing the mold of the inside of a small turtle's shell.

  • I found this Informative 1

"I am glad I shall never be young without wild country to be young in. Of what avail are forty freedoms without a blank spot on the map?"  ~Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) 

 

New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins    

 

point.thumb.jpg.e8c20b9cd1882c9813380ade830e1f32.jpg research.jpg.932a4c776c9696d3cf6133084c2d9a84.jpg  RPV.jpg.d17a6f3deca931bfdce34e2a5f29511d.jpg  SJB.jpg.f032e0b315b0e335acf103408a762803.jpg  butterfly.jpg.71c7cc456dfbbae76f15995f00b221ff.jpg  Htoad.jpg.3d40423ae4f226cfcc7e0aba3b331565.jpg  library.jpg.56c23fbd183a19af79384c4b8c431757.jpg  OIP.jpg.163d5efffd320f70f956e9a53f9cd7db.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The furrows crossing the width were presumably where the ribs were. Now worn away.

I think the ribs on a turtle are flattened out to form the shell. The furrows probably mark the divisions between the shell sections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the 'bottom' surface is a mold of a plasteron's inner surface?

That could explain why fosilized6s thought the bottom shell looked too small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK after looking at turtle carapaces for more than I really would like to ...

It seems to have the right number of "ribs".

It seems the angle of the rib bones at the posterior are too perpendicular to the spine.

So I'm still undecided. :D

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/09/how-the-turtle-got-its-shell-through-skeletal-shifts-and-mus/

http://courses.washington.edu/vertebra/452/photos/diapsids/turtle_photos.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a great example (see figure 2).

Excellent reference, Mike.

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a clue on this one, but thought everyone would like to see this Wealden turtle.
It's an interpretive drawing of the carapace in internal aspect of: Hylaeochelys latiscutata.
 
IMG1.jpg
 
Milner, A.R. (2013)
Rediscovery of the Carapace of the Lost Holotype of the Purbeck Turtle Chelone obovata Owen 1842.
In: Morphology and Evolution of Turtles (pp. 173-178).
Springer Scientific Publishing, 577 pp.
 
 
 

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfooley....Figures 2 C & F look about as close as you could get it.

Thanks so much to you guys for the help......I don't know what amateurs like me did before the internet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sold on turtle now.

Figure 2-C

and for the "belly button" Figure 2-F

I was practically sold from the first post, but you know how some of these IDs go.... The references and local geology have me convinced it's an internal mold of a turtle (maybe with other bones locked inside). Great find. :)

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really fun to see all these new finds, it's almost like a global fossil hunt without leaving the keyboard. but the restriction of only having a few fuzzy photos can be frustrating. Especially when a thread goes on and on like this based on ambiguity of the photos. This would have ended long ago if the fossil was in each person's hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Auspex on this one - I don't think it is a turtle steinkern.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "evidence".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Auspex on this one - I don't think it is a turtle steinkern.

Rich, this thing shares the crude appearance of ribs and a siphuncle with an ammonite. But, those characteristics on this find don't fit typical ammonite morphology. The ribs are too straight and there is no evidence of sutures, or chambers. Given its shape, I would expect more ammonite features to be present on the flat side.

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This rarely happens... Auspex and Richw are so often right on this forum, but I will respectfully disagree with both of them. I have seen more than my share of turtle steinkerns and that is exactly what this is. The divots in the top are where the vert used to be. The grooves running from the center down to the outside edge is where the ribs were. In life the ribs are fused to the inside of each costal plate. In a mold, they leave a groove. No siphuncle there. Excellent find, by the way.

Edited by jpc
  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the bottom view you can see there is still some bone where there were struts joining the carapace to the plastron.

Edited by jpc
  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all-in on turtle steinkern now; thanks, Mike, and everyone who patiently voiced their observations and backed them with compelling information. I'm a slow study sometimes...

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One way, short of examining it, would be to pour some alginate or other "soft" molding material on it, let it gel, then remove it to provide a positive cast. Coat that with something opaque, then photograph it. One problem I have is that given the size and shape of this, if it were a turtle, it would be a very young one, which hadn't unrolled completely yet from the egg compression. In very young turtles, the carapace isn't nearly as well ossified as this would appear to be.

If it is a turtle, it certainly is an exciting find. I'm just not there yet.

Call me "Thomas".

Rich

Edited by RichW9090

The plural of "anecdote" is not "evidence".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rich, "Thomas" is an old acquaintance of mine, of whom I am rather fond ;)

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Thomas...I can't seem to find many more references to persuade you. Nandomas posted this White River turtle steinkern...

post-11220-0-39292800-1408996542.jpg

...in his report, Two Eggs - Sunny Side Up :) .

  • I found this Informative 1

"I am glad I shall never be young without wild country to be young in. Of what avail are forty freedoms without a blank spot on the map?"  ~Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) 

 

New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins    

 

point.thumb.jpg.e8c20b9cd1882c9813380ade830e1f32.jpg research.jpg.932a4c776c9696d3cf6133084c2d9a84.jpg  RPV.jpg.d17a6f3deca931bfdce34e2a5f29511d.jpg  SJB.jpg.f032e0b315b0e335acf103408a762803.jpg  butterfly.jpg.71c7cc456dfbbae76f15995f00b221ff.jpg  Htoad.jpg.3d40423ae4f226cfcc7e0aba3b331565.jpg  library.jpg.56c23fbd183a19af79384c4b8c431757.jpg  OIP.jpg.163d5efffd320f70f956e9a53f9cd7db.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, shucks......

Kicking And

Edited by RichW9090

The plural of "anecdote" is not "evidence".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:hearty-laugh:

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...