rew Posted February 26, 2022 Author Share Posted February 26, 2022 Trilobite of the week #217 is Stapeleyella inconstans of Early Ordovician age from the Hope Shales, Shelve Inlier at Minsterley, West Shropshire, England. This is another member of the Trinucleidae. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted March 5, 2022 Author Share Posted March 5, 2022 (edited) Trilobite of the week #218 is Aulacopleura konincki of Early Silurian age from the Motol Formation at Lodenice, Czech Republic. This proetid is in the family Aulacopleuridae so is what I call an eponymous trilobite -- a bug whose genus gives the family it's in its name. I figure eponymous trilobites probably represent the family they're in better than most. The preservation is flat and ghost like. I'm sure it was a lot more 3D in real life. Edited March 5, 2022 by rew 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted March 12, 2022 Author Share Posted March 12, 2022 Trilobite of the week #219 is Proetus cf. granulatus, a Silurian proetid found in the Hemse bed from Gotland, Sweden. This trilobite is is in the family Proetidae within the order Proetida, so it's another eponymous trilobite. And, indeed, it is a quite typical member of the Proetidae, with genal spines but no radical spines, and no fancy rostrum or other bizarre features, but quite 3 dimensional. The hypostome is exposed. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Kmiecik Posted March 12, 2022 Share Posted March 12, 2022 Is this nicknamed the "Jimmy Durante bug"? If not, it should be. Mark. Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted March 21, 2022 Author Share Posted March 21, 2022 (edited) Trilobite of the week #220 is Tomagnostus fissus, of Middle Cambrian age and from Nine Wells, Wales. This species may be unfamiliar to most American collectors, but its family, Ptychagnostidae, should be known to most collectors of American Cambrian agnostid trilobites. It's 13 mm long, respectable size for an agnostid. Edited March 21, 2022 by rew 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KathyGrant Posted March 28, 2022 Share Posted March 28, 2022 (edited) On 5/19/2019 at 2:43 PM, piranha said: AMNH has the correct name as Ditomopyge producta. Paladin does not have a median preoccipital lobe (termed 'praeoccipital' by Weber) which is a key feature for Ditomopyge. Additionally, the genal spines of Paladin transilis only extend to the 7th thoracic segment and for Ditomopyge producta the genal spines extend to the pygidium along with coarse granulation of the occipital ring. @piranha , so this one is also Ditomopyge producta? Thanks! Edited March 29, 2022 by KathyGrant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted March 28, 2022 Author Share Posted March 28, 2022 (edited) I have three species of Modocia, three species of Amecephalus and here you see that I have two species of Cernuolimbus. Trilobite #221 is Cernuolimbus pegakanthodes of Late Cambrian age, from the McKay Group of British Columbia, Canada. As with Cernuolimbus ludvigseni, there is a line of tiny pits at the front of its head. These are not as well preserved on the current specimen, but are still readily visible on the front left and are a bit pushed into the head on the front right. So this is apparently a general feature of the genus. Although it is not clear from these closeups, this has the same sort of preparation as my Modocia typicalis -- it was found as a ventral when they split the rock, so they glued the two halves back together and prepared it from the other side to get a dorsal trilobite. As a result the trilobite is in a bit of a well on the rock. Edited March 28, 2022 by rew 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted April 3, 2022 Author Share Posted April 3, 2022 (edited) Trilobite of the week #222 is Monodechenella macrocephala of Middle Devonian age from the Kashong Shale, Moscow Formation at Livingston County, New York. This specimen is crunched in on the left side, so it's not my best bug. OTOH, a dinosaur paleontologist would be thrilled to find a specimen as complete and non-distorted as this; we trilobite collectors are spoiled. Edited April 3, 2022 by rew 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted April 10, 2022 Author Share Posted April 10, 2022 (edited) Trilobite of the week #223 is Bumastoides milleri of Late Ordovician age from the Platteville Formation at Grant County, Wisconsin. I have two specimens of this bug. The large one (3.1 cm long) has some of the thorax pushed under the head. The small one is near perfect but is only 2 cm long. That's a common case -- the big but imperfect bug vs. the small but perfect bug. This species is in the Illaenidae and has the classic face of an Illaenid. Edited April 10, 2022 by rew 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted April 16, 2022 Author Share Posted April 16, 2022 Trilobite of the week #224 is Ptychoparia striata of Middle Cambrian age from the Jince Formation at Jince, Czech Republic. There are two good specimens on this rock and one broken up specimen. The piebald coloration is natural and common in this formation. This is genus Ptychoparia in family Ptychopariidae in superfamily Ptychoparioidea in suborder Ptychopariina in order Ptychopariida, so it's as eponymous as a trilobite can get. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted April 24, 2022 Author Share Posted April 24, 2022 Trilobite #225 is Dechenella sp. of Middle Devonian age from Tabamakhlouft Mountain at Issoumour, Morocco. This isn't my best bug, there is some erosion of the thoracic segments. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted April 25, 2022 Share Posted April 25, 2022 2 hours ago, rew said: Trilobite #225 is Dechenella sp. of Middle Devonian age from Tabamakhlouft Mountain at Issoumour, Morocco. This one is Cyberella lemkei. A few of the key identifying features are a preglabellar area approximately equal or longer than the glabella, triangular contour of the frontal glabellar lobe and genal spines that extend to the 7th thoracic segment. Martin Basse in Basse & Müller 2004 erected this new Moroccan species. Basse, M., Müller, P. 2004 Eifel-Trilobiten III: Corynexochida, Proetida (2), Harpetida, Phacopida (2), Lichida. [Eifel-Trilobites III: Corynexochida, Proetida (2), Harpetida, Phacopida (2), Lichida.] Goldschneck im Quelle & Meyer Verlag GmbH & Co., Wiebelsheim, 261 pp. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted April 25, 2022 Author Share Posted April 25, 2022 Thanks. One more bug in my collection now correctly identified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 1, 2022 Author Share Posted May 1, 2022 Trilobite #226 is Hesslerides arcentensis of Mississippian age from the Lake Valley Formation of Luna County, New Mexico. This is the only trilobite I have from New Mexico. This is as good a specimen as you'll ever see -- it is as well preserved as the one on the AMNH trilobite gallery and at 3 cm in length it is slightly bigger. Like most members of the Phillipsiidae it is a plain Jane bug. I don't know why it was the small and plain trilobites that survived the Devonian mass extinctions, but that's how it turned out. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 6, 2022 Author Share Posted May 6, 2022 Trilobite of the week #226 is an Asaphid usually called Homotelus bromidensis but I see that on Sam Gon's trilobite site he has Homotelus as a junior synonym of Isotelus, so this bug might properly be called Isotelus bromidensis. I'll let piranha have the last word on this issue. It is of Middle Ordovician age from the Pooleville Member, Bromide Formation at Criner Hills, Carter County, Oklahoma. This is the same location that Frencrinuroides capitonis (trilobite #71) comes from. This is a fairly typical multiple specimen plate, with two fully articulated specimens and two disarticulated specimens. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 Jell & Adrain 2003 and Whittington 1950 regard Homotelus as a synonym of Isotelus. Amati 2014 suggested that some species of Homotelus including H. bromidensis might be synonymous with Vogdesia, but unfortunately did not recognize the previous synonymy of Shaw 1974. A colleague commented recently: "The holotype of Vogdesia bearsi has been lost. A neotype has been designated, and there are topotypes. It has very high eyes, nothing like Isotelus simplex, or Homotelus bromidensis. In my opinion, Vogdesia should be restricted to the type species. Given the controversy I still carry mine as Homotelus." Shaw, F.C. 1974 Simpson Group (Middle Ordovician) Trilobites of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology 48(5) Supplement: Memoir 6:1-54 "Homotelus was erected by Raymond (1920) for isotelines lacking genal spines but with wide cranidia, weak axial furrows, elevated palpebral lobes and a lateral border. Jaanusson (in Moore, 1959) added that a frontal area is lacking and the palpebral lobes are positioned slightly in front of the transverse mid-line of the cranidium. Whittington (1950) noted that the differences between Homotelus and Isotelus are small and recommended restricting the genus to the type. I agree that the genus should be restricted but feel that the lack of a frontal area on the cranidium allies Homotelus more closely with Vogdesia than Isotelus. Some species previously assigned to Homotelus (e.g., H. bromidensis, Esker, 1964) may belong in Vogdesia." Amati, L. 2014 Isoteline Trilobites of the Viola Group (Ordovician: Oklahoma): Systematics and Stratigraphic Occurrence. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 151:1-125 PDF LINK Jell, P.A., Adrain, J.M. 2003 Available Generic Names for Trilobites. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 48(2):331-553 PDF LINK "Homotelus differs from Isotelus in that it is a proportionately broader form, has the eyes placed farther forward, and has an ornament of fine pustules, not the characteristic small, closely-spaced pits of l. gigas. The hypostomes of the two genera are closely comparable. The differences between the two forms are thus small, and it is doubtful if they should be ranked as separate genera. I consider that if the name Homotelus is retained it should be used at present only for the genotype, and that it is probable that many of the species referred to this genus by Raymond (1920, pp. 288-292; 1925, pp. 88-95) do not belong here." Whittington, H.B. 1950 Sixteen Ordovician Genotype Trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 24(5):531-565 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 7, 2022 Author Share Posted May 7, 2022 Okay, Homotelus it is, at least for the time being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 14, 2022 Author Share Posted May 14, 2022 (edited) Trilobite of the week #227 is Bristolia harringtoni of Early Cambrian age from the Latham Shale at San Bernardino County, California. This species is lower in the formation than Bristolia bristolensis and has a different genal angle. B. harringtoni is considered to be an intermediary between B. mojavensis and B. bristolensis. Edited May 14, 2022 by rew 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sjfriend Posted May 14, 2022 Share Posted May 14, 2022 1 hour ago, rew said: Trilobite of the week #227 is Bristolia harringtoni of Early Cambrian age from the Latham Shale at San Bernardino County, California. This species is lower in the formation than Bristolia bristolensis and has a different genal angle. B. harringtoni is considered to be an intermediary between B. mojavensis and B. bristolensis. Beautiful Bristolia. I have a couple cephalons but nothing close to complete from the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 15, 2022 Author Share Posted May 15, 2022 18 hours ago, Sjfriend said: Beautiful Bristolia. I have a couple cephalons but nothing close to complete from the site. I was fortunate to snag this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 21, 2022 Author Share Posted May 21, 2022 (edited) Trilobite of the week #228 is Paladin morrowensis, a Pennsylvanian age trilobite from the Graford Formation at Lake Bridgeport, Wise County, Texas. The shell is cracked, the pygidium is disarticulated, and so is part of the thorax, but still, you have no trouble telling what the trilobite looked like from this fossil. At 4 cm in length it is my largest post-Devonian trilobite. I got this bug 7 years ago and haven't seen another example of this species since. Edited May 21, 2022 by rew 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 33 minutes ago, rew said: Trilobite of the week #228 is Paladin morrowensis, a Pennsylvanian age trilobite from the Graford Formation at Lake Bridgeport, Wise County, Texas. A few of these inadvertently labeled as Paladin morrowensis were making the rounds many years ago. However, the presence of a median preoccipital lobe distinguishes this specimen as Ditomopyge scitula. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 21, 2022 Author Share Posted May 21, 2022 I see that the AMNH trilobite gallery has several specimens of Ditomopyge scitula, one of which is from the Graford Formation at Bridgeport, Texas. It does look a lot like my bug, although the median preoccipital lobe is more obvious in the AMNH specimen. With my bug I have to sort of squint to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew Posted May 25, 2022 Author Share Posted May 25, 2022 (edited) And now for something you haven't seen a while -- a bonus trilobite. Bonus trilobite of the week #229 is Ditomopyge sp. of Pennsylvanian (Gzhelian Stage) age, from the Ututau Mountains of the Dzhezkazgan Region, Karagandy Province, Kazakhstan. It was sold to me as Phillipsia sp. but the AMNH Trilobite Gallery has the same bug and calls it Ditomopyge sp., so I'm sticking with that unless piranha says otherwise. This is my second youngest (second latest trilobite). It lived during the last stage of the Pennsylvanian, after the very earliest reptiles had evolved. Trilobites would continue to exist for 50 million years after this trilobite lived, but would never regain their former glory. Instead, they just got scarcer over time, with fewer species over time, until they got finished off in the great mass extinction at the end of the Permian. The new kids on the block, reptiles, had a great future ahead of them. One line would become the pterosaurs, the first vertebrates with true flight. Another would become the dinosaurs, and rule the land during the Mesozoic. Another line, through the synapsids, became the first mammals, and one obscure line within that clade would eventually walk on the moon. Edited May 25, 2022 by rew 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 15 hours ago, rew said: Bonus trilobite of the week #229 is Ditomopyge sp. From this angle it looks like this one does not have a median preoccipital lobe. If that feature is absent then Kaskia sp. is a better match. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now