Jump to content

Show Us Your Fossils Challenge Mode: Ordered By Geologic Time Period!


MeargleSchmeargl

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Coco said:

Maybe because the photo is stored on your computer. Because I don’t see it either.

 

Coco

 

Hi Coco,

 

I don't have an explanation for that.  Can you see the description I wrote for the photo?  The Fossil Forum must have saved the post somehow or I wouldn't be able to see it.  I can see it even if I'm not signed in.  It's too late for me to make a change with that post.  Maybe I'll solve it if the Early Carboniferous comes up for me again and I'll do a double (one so everyone can see the last one and a new one).

 

Jess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, siteseer said:

 

Hi Coco,

 

I don't have an explanation for that.  Can you see the description I wrote for the photo?  The Fossil Forum must have saved the post somehow or I wouldn't be able to see it.  I can see it even if I'm not signed in.  It's too late for me to make a change with that post.  Maybe I'll solve it if the Early Carboniferous comes up for me again and I'll do a double (one so everyone can see the last one and a new one).

 

Jess

 

You should be able to delete the existing image (or 'image') in edit, and then re-upload it. I've done so when I've accidentally had duplicate or wrong images in posts

Context is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Missourian said:

 

You should be able to delete the existing image (or 'image') in edit, and then re-upload it. I've done so when I've accidentally had duplicate or wrong images in posts

 

I posted that a couple of days ago.  I can't edit it now.  It's best to just keep moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, siteseer said:

Hi Coco,

 

Can you see the description I wrote for the photo?

 

Yes Jess, I have read the text, only the photo wasn't visible. The link was broken.

 

Coco

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since no one gets Precambrian rolling, we'll start with this
Hongshiyanaspis yiliangensis from the early Cambrian. Yunnan-China.

 

 

IMG_20220904_114042583.thumb.jpg.643d673a39e6f3d419678fa3a776821b.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Paleorunner said:

Since no one gets Precambrian rolling, we'll start with this
Hongshiyanaspis yiliangensis from the early Cambrian. Yunnan-China.

 

 

IMG_20220904_114042583.thumb.jpg.643d673a39e6f3d419678fa3a776821b.jpg

 

Yes,  I think if no one adds to the thread in a day or two, we can skip to the next time unit.  At some point, we might run out of Precambrian pieces. 

 

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, siteseer said:

 

Yes,  I think if no one adds to the thread in a day or two, we can skip to the next time unit.  At some point, we might run out of Precambrian pieces. 

 

 

I can add some more next runs, new thread for me, still have a lot to contribute to (early and ice-age and lot of others :eyeroll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rocket said:

so I show a lovely one, precambrian of South Africa

DSC_0029.thumb.JPG.1aa8674bbd86e02462f230d528fa077c.JPG

Wow... What age? (Precambrian is a long time) Any specifics on formation/location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Wrangellian said:

Wow... What age? (Precambrian is a long time) Any specifics on formation/location?

 

Pongola-Supergroup, Transvaal. My last info was a dating at around 3 - 3.4 Billion years

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, rocket said:

so I show a lovely one, precambrian of South Africa

DSC_0029.thumb.JPG.1aa8674bbd86e02462f230d528fa077c.JPG

I think this is Banded Iron Formation - Penge Formation 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png MotM August 2023 - Eclectic Collector

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yoda said:

I think this is Banded Iron Formation - Penge Formation 

 

would be Chounifort-Group than, approx. 2.5 - 2.6 Billion years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rocket said:

would be Chounifort-Group than, approx. 2.5 - 2.6 Billion years.

I think that should be Chuniespoort Group (or Chunniespoort?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've been sitting in the Ordovician for about two days.  I'll get us rolling again with this:

 

Lepidocyclus capax

Late Ordovician

Liberty Formation

Brookville, Franklin County, Indiana

3/4 of an inch (20mm) across

 

lepido.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Silurian seems to be a sticking point sometimes so here's a specimen to keep the ball rolling.

 

Unidentified brachiopod

Middle Silurian

Waldron Shale

Bartholomew County, Indiana

3/8 of an inch/10mm across

brach_silur1.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eldredgeia sp. (trilobite in nodule)

Devonian

Icla Lutita Superior (Upper Icla Shale)

Patacamaya, near La Paz, Bolivia

nodule is about 51mm long and the trilobite is a little shorter than that.

 

 

 

 

meta_boliv.jpg

Edited by siteseer
identification correction
  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm reposting the cladodont shark tooth from the previous go-around as I've been told the photo isn't showing for at least two people.

 

Cladodont shark tooth

Early Carboniferous (Mississippian)

Burlington Limestone

Augusta, Des Moines County, Iowa

clado_iowa.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, thanks to the Mazon Creek collectors here on the Forum who identified this specimen for me as Lepidostrobus

 

It's a genus of extinct vascular plant that includes some primitive Devonian-Carboniferous forms.  Lepidostrobus had been a loosely-defined genus for a strobilis of a lycopod or a fruiting body of a Lepidodendron tree in particular.  A strobilis is a technical term for cone-like structure in lycopods to distinguish them from cones in conifers though they are still informally called cones. However, after further study, there is more support for Lepidostrobus as a valid name.

 

Lepidostrobus sp. 

Late Carboniferous

Carbondale Formation

Francis Creek Shale Member

Will County, Illinois

 

 

mazon_cone.jpg

Edited by siteseer
  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got it last week, and it's all I have from the Permian.
Annularia orientalis. Permian. Sanxi formation. Yuanquan--China.

 

IMG_20220904_110014396.thumb.jpg.0a9ae1c834b3dff5b0ec86011181c6db.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...