siteseer Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 11 hours ago, Coco said: Maybe because the photo is stored on your computer. Because I don’t see it either. Coco Hi Coco, I don't have an explanation for that. Can you see the description I wrote for the photo? The Fossil Forum must have saved the post somehow or I wouldn't be able to see it. I can see it even if I'm not signed in. It's too late for me to make a change with that post. Maybe I'll solve it if the Early Carboniferous comes up for me again and I'll do a double (one so everyone can see the last one and a new one). Jess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 6 hours ago, Kiros said: Helarctos malayanus Late Pleistocene Central Java Length 7 cm Wow, great specimen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missourian Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 6 hours ago, siteseer said: Hi Coco, I don't have an explanation for that. Can you see the description I wrote for the photo? The Fossil Forum must have saved the post somehow or I wouldn't be able to see it. I can see it even if I'm not signed in. It's too late for me to make a change with that post. Maybe I'll solve it if the Early Carboniferous comes up for me again and I'll do a double (one so everyone can see the last one and a new one). Jess You should be able to delete the existing image (or 'image') in edit, and then re-upload it. I've done so when I've accidentally had duplicate or wrong images in posts Context is critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 3 hours ago, Missourian said: You should be able to delete the existing image (or 'image') in edit, and then re-upload it. I've done so when I've accidentally had duplicate or wrong images in posts I posted that a couple of days ago. I can't edit it now. It's best to just keep moving forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 10 hours ago, siteseer said: Hi Coco, Can you see the description I wrote for the photo? Yes Jess, I have read the text, only the photo wasn't visible. The link was broken. Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleorunner Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 Since no one gets Precambrian rolling, we'll start with this Hongshiyanaspis yiliangensis from the early Cambrian. Yunnan-China. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleuromya Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 I still have some precambrian Stromatolites left to show, but unfortunately can't photograph them at the moment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 so I show a lovely one, precambrian of South Africa 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 3 hours ago, Paleorunner said: Since no one gets Precambrian rolling, we'll start with this Hongshiyanaspis yiliangensis from the early Cambrian. Yunnan-China. Yes, I think if no one adds to the thread in a day or two, we can skip to the next time unit. At some point, we might run out of Precambrian pieces. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 10 hours ago, siteseer said: Yes, I think if no one adds to the thread in a day or two, we can skip to the next time unit. At some point, we might run out of Precambrian pieces. I can add some more next runs, new thread for me, still have a lot to contribute to (early and ice-age and lot of others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangellian Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 17 hours ago, rocket said: so I show a lovely one, precambrian of South Africa Wow... What age? (Precambrian is a long time) Any specifics on formation/location? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 6 minutes ago, Wrangellian said: Wow... What age? (Precambrian is a long time) Any specifics on formation/location? Pongola-Supergroup, Transvaal. My last info was a dating at around 3 - 3.4 Billion years 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 22 hours ago, rocket said: so I show a lovely one, precambrian of South Africa I think this is Banded Iron Formation - Penge Formation 1 1 MotM August 2023 - Eclectic Collector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket Posted September 7, 2022 Share Posted September 7, 2022 2 hours ago, Yoda said: I think this is Banded Iron Formation - Penge Formation would be Chounifort-Group than, approx. 2.5 - 2.6 Billion years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangellian Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 14 hours ago, rocket said: would be Chounifort-Group than, approx. 2.5 - 2.6 Billion years. I think that should be Chuniespoort Group (or Chunniespoort?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocket Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 1 hour ago, Wrangellian said: I think that should be Chuniespoort Group (or Chunniespoort?) I agree, checked the english papers and found the mistake . 21 Lithostratigraphy for the Chuniespoort-Ghaap Groups, in the... | Download Scientific Diagram (researchgate.net) sorry for the confusion I did and thanks for help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 We've been sitting in the Ordovician for about two days. I'll get us rolling again with this: Lepidocyclus capax Late Ordovician Liberty Formation Brookville, Franklin County, Indiana 3/4 of an inch (20mm) across 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 The Silurian seems to be a sticking point sometimes so here's a specimen to keep the ball rolling. Unidentified brachiopod Middle Silurian Waldron Shale Bartholomew County, Indiana 3/8 of an inch/10mm across 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 (edited) Eldredgeia sp. (trilobite in nodule) Devonian Icla Lutita Superior (Upper Icla Shale) Patacamaya, near La Paz, Bolivia nodule is about 51mm long and the trilobite is a little shorter than that. Edited September 8, 2022 by siteseer identification correction 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 I'm reposting the cladodont shark tooth from the previous go-around as I've been told the photo isn't showing for at least two people. Cladodont shark tooth Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Burlington Limestone Augusta, Des Moines County, Iowa 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, siteseer said: Eldredgeops sp. (trilobite in nodule) Eldredgeia 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 (edited) First, thanks to the Mazon Creek collectors here on the Forum who identified this specimen for me as Lepidostrobus It's a genus of extinct vascular plant that includes some primitive Devonian-Carboniferous forms. Lepidostrobus had been a loosely-defined genus for a strobilis of a lycopod or a fruiting body of a Lepidodendron tree in particular. A strobilis is a technical term for cone-like structure in lycopods to distinguish them from cones in conifers though they are still informally called cones. However, after further study, there is more support for Lepidostrobus as a valid name. Lepidostrobus sp. Late Carboniferous Carbondale Formation Francis Creek Shale Member Will County, Illinois Edited September 8, 2022 by siteseer 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 5 minutes ago, piranha said: Eldredgeia Thanks, Scott. Corrected in original post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleorunner Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 I got it last week, and it's all I have from the Permian. Annularia orientalis. Permian. Sanxi formation. Yuanquan--China. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 I'm back online again, this time with a Hypocladiscites subtornatus from the Middle Triassic Carnian on the Millibrunnkogel in Upper Austria. 1 6 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now